|
|
Re: Incorrect Info On Restrictive Endorsements
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Credit Forum Index ]
Posted by joanne (217.162.250.103) on June 04, 2002 at 23:36:48:
In Reply to: Re: Incorrect Info On Restrictive Endorsements posted by Why Chat on June 04, 2002 at 23:21:13:
so when I CA, writes a letter saying this acct is settled and the acct is now closed,, its BS, unless they send you a 1099, its really a settlement for now? the reason I ask, is my sister was sued by a CA, original balance 2500, the judgement was for 5131, the seized 2700 from her bank acct, then demanded a certified check for 650, then sent her a letter saying, satisified,settled acct closed, the judgement is reported as satisified,, but on her reports, every month update 1145 still owed,, so theoratically she still owes them 1145? also, I have a collection item on my report for 94 from 5/1998, its from ATT broadband,,but in 1998 it was media one,,,,, now its being reported as ATT being a client of the CA,, if I pay ATT the original 30, does the CA have to get it off the report if I pay the OC,, thanks sorry so long, I just dont want to make any mistakes,,
Follow Ups:
Post a Followup
|
