Re: CA/Dunning letter--mini miranda technicality ???
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Credit Forum Index ]
Posted by Why Chat (12.77.146.214) on July 12, 2002 at 09:23:56:
In Reply to: CA/Dunning letter--mini miranda technicality ??? posted by piggybank on July 11, 2002 at 21:06:50:
I posted this a few days ago, I think it will fill the bill if you modify it for your situation.
Posted by Why Chat (209.240.222.130) on July 04, 2002 at 18:11:47: In Reply to: Re: Med. coll/ They sent a letter. posted by mtnair on July 04, 2002 at 17:08:17:
If the dentist is still in practice, you might try something new,Send the CRA's a letter with a photocopy of your bill, state that this was the original creditor, and this was the date of service, which accordng to Cal. and Federal law is the start of the 7 year legal reporting period. State that the collection agencies acting as agents of Dr. XXX are illegally re-aging the report of your date of service,thereby creating a slander of your credit and damages to you. Request that the CRA's verify with the ORIGINAL creditor, DrXX the correct date of service.Add that the FTC has given it's opinion that an OC may be liable for damages done by it's agents in false reporting to CRA's or other fraudulent collection activities.Send a copy RRR to the dentist with a covering letter stating that he may be liable for any false reports made by his agents, even if the account was sold to them, if he assists in their misrepresentations by not verifying the correct information to the CRA's.(make sure he gets a copy of the bill also)
Health care people are quick to fix something if it will imact their malpractice insurance rates.
Follow Ups:
Post a Followup
|
