Re: When disputing with CRA does
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Credit Forum Index ]
Posted by Why Chat (188.8.131.52) on September 16, 2002 at 19:57:05:
In Reply to: Re: When disputing with CRA does posted by Imp on September 16, 2002 at 14:46:25:
OF COURSE it is RMA who re-aged. BUT it is the CRA who is in violation for not deleting a fraudulent account when the evidence is CLEAR that they could NOT have properly verified the account information.
Post a Followup