Re: Pacific Law Center

Posted by JR (152.163.189.170) on September 24, 2002 at 21:12:05:

In Reply to: Re: Pacific Law Center posted by Greg on September 24, 2002 at 20:29:43:

Telecheck has been sued before for violations of the FDCPA.

The answer to the Pep Boys question is a typical attorney answer, "It depends". As a generalization, if the check wasn't paid, they should still have possession of it. Therefore, proof that it wasn't paid. Could they have an acceptable answer as to why they don't have possession? Possibly. You should also be able to get your records to prove that it was paid. Do you have an acceptable answer as to why you can't? Possibly. So, you see, it depends.

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup