Re: JR- Copy of Nelson v. Chase decision Part 3

Posted by JR (205.188.209.12) on October 21, 2002 at 22:00:22:

In Reply to: Re: JR- Copy of Nelson v. Chase decision Part 3 posted by Lady on October 21, 2002 at 19:18:04:

I didn't mean the facts in the Nelson case. I meant the facts in a similar case against a creditor. In other words, just because the higher court ruled that a consumer can sue a creditor, there still has be substance to the case.

So, from here out, in the Ninth Circuit for sure, a lower court will not dismiss a claim against a creditor based solely on the fact that it is a creditor being sued.

You may email me at PacificLawCenter@aol.com if you would like.

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup