should we sue?help.

Posted by afool (209.214.0.143) on November 21, 2002 at 13:52:37:

now that i know our rights were violated, and
that the summons we were served is full of lies,
and the affavdit of acct. is apparently a fraud,
stamped by notary, and signed by some other person,
not the notary listed on the stamp.
whychat, said get a lawyer, and i am in the process
of trying to do that., to try to get out of this settlement, but
my other question is should i try to file a suit against the ca for putting inflated amt. on summons,
and lying , & for it saying that we were given a paper agreeing to the balance by oc, when we had made a pymt
to oc, just the month before that and it was still our regular statement, no chargeoff at that point, and they said we agreed to this amount(inflated amt, and wrong) and i faxed their atty. proof -our statement from oc, with correct balance as of that date, and they still never changed it. we are paying on this , through a stipulation of settlement, and i wonder if
we should try to sue them or just try to get out of this mess, since this suit legally shouldn't of been filed, last pymt date 8/1997. , it was, past the sol.
what do you guys think, and what court would it go to
federal? if the violations are in a summons, does that still mean our rights were violated under the fcrpa? they have also reaged this acct. with one cb, and put the wrong $amt. there. any input would be appreciated, i would really like to sock it to these guys, is it hopeless to go up against them ?just imagine how many people they are doing this to. thanks for any help, and input.

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup