Re: RMA
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Credit Forum Index ]
Posted by jm10101
(198.80.153.10) on December 10, 2002 at 15:10:05:
In Reply to: Re: RMA posted by LadynRed on December 10, 2002 at 13:32:40:
LadynRed - I don't mean to be a pain, and I generally find your feedback quite insightful, but I doubt your advice in this case. Where does the FTC define what is required to validate? I understand this to be something of a gray area, lacking explicit definition. If I'm wrong, please point me [ and tryin2 ] to the reference. You made a good point on the SOL - it would almost certainly need to be before Nov 97. Now we need to know if the state considers the starting point - last charge, last payment, first delinquency...And, as Why Chat notes it's a little trickier as it's 1997. tryin2 - As for the validation letter, I don't think you should send another - They have enough to validate you unless you intent to deny that the signature is yours. Concentrate on the gathering evidence to establish that you are beyond the SOL.
Follow Ups:
Post a Followup
|
