Re: JM10101's bebuttal ;)
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Credit Forum Index ]
Posted by jm10101
(198.80.153.10) on December 11, 2002 at 14:03:22:
In Reply to: Re: JM10101's bebuttal ;) posted by LadynRed on December 11, 2002 at 13:49:00:
Interesting about the double accounting... Firstly - the SOL letter sounds like the best bet from what I've read in Why Chat's posts. This validation discussion is rather academic... I agree - the double account is bogus and makes them look like crooks. I would hold onto it JUST in case they tried to bring suit against you. At a minimal it misleads you about the amount of the actual debt, which falls under the definition of unfair business practices in the FDCPA. I personally think a good, clean accounting with signed receipts would go a long way in front of a judge, but the itemization tryin2 has described does not exemplify good accounting.
Follow Ups:
Post a Followup
|
