Home
Public Forum
Credit Reports
Apply For Cards
Credit Directory
Credit Overview
Credit Problems
Credit News
International
Credit Glossary
Purchase Books
Credit Laws
Business Credit
Merchant Accts
   

Re: No offense, Christina


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Credit Forum Index ]

Posted by Dave (63.228.52.57) on December 15, 2002 at 20:20:39:

In Reply to: Can a CA sue if ....? posted by Christina on December 15, 2002 at 09:13:32:

you posted this in the permissible purpose thread and just wanted to let you know that you are WRONNNNGG, lol. Original creditors are not bound by the FDCPA, and can only be liable when they pose as 3rd party collectors.

The fact that you don't know what "standing" is speaks volumes, lol, and no offense.

Here is what you posted in the perm purp thread:

"When a LL hires a CA to try to collect an "alleged debt", the LL opens themselves up to the liability and restrictions of the FDCPA - the CA must follow the law."

Lol, you are suggesting that strict vicarious liablity applies to a party who is not a debt collector, not a chance..and you won't find a single case holding that.

However, you will find cases where a CA is vicariously liable for its attorney's FDCPA violation.

Good luck. :0)


Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:


[ Follow Ups ]   [ Post Followup ]   [ Credit Forum Index ]

 

    Top Of Page

  

Copyright © 1999-2002 Enkephalos Web Design