Re: No offense, Christina

Posted by Christina (205.188.209.12) on December 15, 2002 at 21:44:03:

In Reply to: Re: No offense, Christina posted by Dave on December 15, 2002 at 20:20:39:

How do you justify a LL (remember I had to "spell out" what LL meant for you) as a CREDITOR without being a "Judgment Creditor"?

A lease ageement doesn't constitute an extension of credit, so the LL would not be readily considered a Creditor; then I would consider the relationship between the LL and the CA as, let me see, PRINCIPLE-AGENT or respondeat/superior.

The LL can be held liable for the CA's violations under that relationship.

And by the way, I AM NOT THE ONE WHO NEEDED CLARIFICATION OF "STANDING", be sure to read the posts correctly, this, "speaks volumes" lol, no offense.

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup