Re: followup to Missouri SOL for Why Chat

Posted by Why Chat (209.240.198.61) on December 16, 2002 at 18:58:54:

In Reply to: Re: followup to Missouri SOL for Why Chat posted by missourimule on December 16, 2002 at 18:25:32:

She lost a case where she ruled that ss payments were not exempt from BK proceedings, so as far as I can see she isn't vey swift.

However, her law firm DOES have some interesting association with Canadian, German & Saudi $$$, although they are better known for a tranvestite case that made headlnes.

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup