Re: Camco, CA or not?.
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Credit Forum Index ]
Posted by scott (24.166.35.102) on December 18, 2002 at 11:10:31:
In Reply to: Camco, CA or not?. posted by watergate in nc on December 18, 2002 at 10:12:13:
I swear to you this- if watergate ignores me I will never, EVER, help another person on this board again. Email me at picantel4343@hotmail.com and tell me what lies and abuse camco is doing and saying. I do not need your personal info- just the age of the debt and what they are doing. Also, if they call you then tape them. It appears to be legal. If you call them then do not tape them but who the hell would call them anyway. In one case, a New York trial court was asked to apply the Pennsylvania wiretap law -- which requires consent of all parties -- to a call placed by a prostitute in Pennsylvania to a man in New York. Unlike the Pennsylvania wiretap statute, the New York and federal statutes require the consent of only one party. The call was recorded with the woman's consent by reporters for The Globe, a national tabloid newspaper. The court ruled that the law of the state where the injury occurred, New York, should apply. (Krauss v. Globe International)
Follow Ups:
Post a Followup
|