Home
Public Forum
Credit Reports
Apply For Cards
Credit Directory
Credit Overview
Credit Problems
Credit News
International
Credit Glossary
Purchase Books
Credit Laws
Business Credit
Merchant Accts
   

Re: Why Chat--This is better than Disneyland.... I think


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Credit Forum Index ]

Posted by Why Chat (209.240.198.61) on February 03, 2003 at 01:25:35:

In Reply to: Why Chat--This is better than Disneyland.... I think posted by joseph F. on February 03, 2003 at 01:08:40:


If the OC is reporting 0 balance on a transferred account there is nothing I know of in any law that could "force" them to stop reporting.

I do not claim ANYTHING will "work", all I am saying is-- this technique takes advantage of existing case law in Ca and other States that have found against CAs who try to collect on time-barred accounts.

Nothing will work unless it is tried, I personally do not believe in filing lawsuits to "punish" offending CRAs or get $$ in a shakedown of CRAs or even CAs, however I DO believe in using the laws to obtain your legal rights.So, to answer your question, what if the CRA does not remove the account? If they have claimed the CA verified, you file suit against the CA, if not -you file suit against the CRA.

If you have followed "my" site for 2 years, you have me beat,as I started CONTRIBUTING voluntarily to this forum 13 months ago.




Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:


[ Follow Ups ]   [ Post Followup ]   [ Credit Forum Index ]

 

    Top Of Page

  

Copyright © 1999-2002 Enkephalos Web Design