Re: judgment states one thing Citibank says another

Posted by Keyser Soze (152.163.253.37) on May 22, 2003 at 22:04:33:

In Reply to: judgment states one thing Citibank says another posted by Faitho1 on May 21, 2003 at 12:20:23:

One of the 'advanced collection techniques' taught to marauders in the collections racket is to spin the interrogatories on you. In other words, if you are sued and taken to court and served with interrogatories the want you to provide the information they should already have.
But this is their party, they invited you, let them make the sangwiches, and then you can toss their vomitose little banquet into the gutter where most of these creeps hang out by presenting them with a check proving when last you paid. Next payment due which was missed and not made up is the default date. That begins the statute of limitations. A statement will do nicely also.
Now it's up to these vomit-bunnies to show a payment made subsequently, and they can't do that because they are hopeless, small, insignifigant, putrid insects whose lives are so empty and
twisted that all they can do is harass people for money which isn't even collectable.
Thus is the nature of the 'highly trained collections professional', who of course upholds the 'highest standards of the industry." These goofs impart new meaning to the term 'sub-human'.

Professionally,

Keyser Soze

"I said Premier Kissoff is an atheistic, degenerate, Commie."
- Gen. Buck Turgidson, "Dr. Strangelove"
c. 1964

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup