Re: FILED ANSWER / RECEIVED (INTERROGATORIES NOTICE) Attn: Keyser Soze

Posted by Keyser Soze (205.188.208.41) on August 22, 2003 at 22:24:47:

In Reply to: Re: FILED ANSWER / RECEIVED (INTERROGATORIES NOTICE) Attn: Keyser Soze posted by Jersey Battle on August 22, 2003 at 12:30:38:

Am not a lawyer, know just enough about the law to make a complete fool of myself. As well, haven't seen the questions they are asking.General practice is to admit things which are obvious and not open to question such as length of time at current address, name. Otherwise, lack of knowledge is the way to plead. They might ask you to admit or deny owing a specific amount of money on the account. To deny such might seem wise as they usually grossly inflate the amount owed. On the other hand they can try to spin that into an admission that by denying you owe the inflated amount you are acknowledging you owe something less.
Clever, ain't they? So are those little grey bugs that swim around in institutional toilet bowls. They can swim all day long and never lose their way.
Again if something is obvious and not open to question then either admit or deny if you wish, just be very careful about providing them with any kind of straw at which to grasp. When in doubt, if a question makes you instinctively uncomfortable, plead lack of knowledge. Watch out for traps. Hope this helps. Will gladly review the questions if you wish.

Wishfully,

Keyser Soze

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup