Re: motion for summary judgment

Posted by Keyser Soze (152.163.253.37) on September 17, 2003 at 20:26:39:

In Reply to: motion for summary judgment posted by lost in OK on September 17, 2003 at 08:26:11:

Dear Lost;

Your name is a misnomer as you aren't lost at all. If you were you'd have gone along with these pipsqueak predators and their bullshale tactics.
As advised by minds far finer than mine, file answers to interogatories right away and bear in mind you are not considered an expert by the court, you are an unsophisticated layman answering a suit filed by an expert. This means sometimes you are allowed a mistake.
Motion for Summary Judgement is an intimidation tactic designed to circumvent a hearing by way of scaring you off from any further defense.
The motion is the enemy scumbag lawyer's way of stating that his case is proven, no more triable issues of fact thus he's entitled to his judgement and you are doomed.
Bull. It's just a motion and motions are about posturing, bullshale, lies, and promises. He has not proven his case as there is still no reply to your demand for validation.
You can't get in trouble with the FTC for not answering interogatories but he sure can for failing to validate. Hope he doesn't, meanwhile you've answered the questions carefully pleading lack of knowledge.
In many arenas of this scumbag predatory post-Nineties society the battles are about different things but the dynamics are the same. Specifically the enemy files a nuisance suit against you leaving himself wide open for complaints and countersuit. He just hopes to scare you into signing your death warrant thereby making it easy for him to get his undeserved money.
This dirtbag is far more afraid of going to court than are you. Many an outhouse cockroach collection lawyer has been reamed a new one by an irate judge for bringing a false malicious suit into his courtroom.

Innocently,

Keyser Soze

"Funny, I never thought of it as a game."
- Det. Harry Callahan, "Sudden Impact",
c. 1983

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup