|
|
Re: CC dispute/Asset Acceptance?
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Credit Forum Index ]
Posted by Keyser Soze
(205.188.209.144) on October 08, 2003 at 22:52:47:
In Reply to: CC dispute/Asset Acceptance? posted by Charlotte on October 08, 2003 at 11:45:01:
This is vintage behavior from Rufus "Bud" "The Dean of Bad Debt" Reitzel's early-sixties basement chem lab monster known as AssXXXX Acceptic Crap-o-ration. They lie and lie and lie. Their favorite old illegal parlor trick is suing on time-barred debt.
But see, ol' Rufe trained his macaques good, see? 'Cause first they re-age the debt in order to defend against an SOL countersuit. Clever, huh? Too clever by half, as grandma used to say. They are sued for this stupid greedy ploy over and over and over just the same way some lowlife moronic jerk gets arrested for stealing car stereos over and over and over,yet neither stops.
Why? Because ill gotten gain exceeds the costs of criminal consequences. Crime pays whether it's some thug with a crowbar or a gang of thugs calling themselves 'collections professionals' whose tools are telephones, stupidly phrased illegal dunning letters, and a toilet beneath which to hide when legal retribution arrives.
File with the FTC and your state AG. The complaint pile grows higher and sooner or later one sheet sends a' tumblin' the whole stack, an avalanche of legal troubles. See under heading "National Check Control".
This debt is long past SOL, CA's risk myriad legal sanctions for pursuing it, despite opinions expressed over the weekend by someone stupidly trying to bait some of us into a debate.
Kick a bully, watch him run away. Wee wee wee alla way home. He'll live to bully another day but he'll not likely mess with you. Punks don't like challenges and 'collections professionals' definetly do prefer easy hits. A polite way of calling them punks. It's important to be polite. Politely, Keyser Soze Thank you very much for so kindly reading this.
Follow Ups:
Post a Followup
|
