Home
Public Forum
Credit Reports
Apply For Cards
Credit Directory
Credit Overview
Credit Problems
Credit News
International
Credit Glossary
Purchase Books
Credit Laws
Business Credit
Merchant Accts
   

Re: Nunc pro tunc/Judgment


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Credit Forum Index ]

Posted by CAK (66.140.213.155) on December 01, 2003 at 16:58:46:

In Reply to: Nunc pro tunc/Judgment posted by NeedHelpwithJudgment on December 01, 2003 at 13:57:57:

I will try to respond to your off the wall comments as you are mis-informed.

You said that you did not have enough information to give an opinion as to whether or not to file a motion to vacate.

"Answer in you previous post" You told the poster, you should continue your motion to vacate. It sure sounds like you were telling the poster to "continue on with his/her Motion to Vacate". It also sounds, by your statement that you have sufficient information to form an opinion as to whether or not to vacate.

As to the remark of dubioius "legal advice" I would simply say, as I am not an attorney that I don't give legal advice, just reasoning in common layman terms. It would be up to the individual to accept it as legal advice.

You mention a website run by a Mark Perkel, whom I have never heard of, and have never visited his web-site or even know if one exists. As you have sufficiently perked everyone's attention now, I'm sure his website will now get some NEW traffic.

I can't tell from your next statement that, "the whole Mo. (and indeed Federal)Court system is corrupt and does things illegally" if your accusing me of this or not. Be very careful Why Chat, as I am a very worthy opponet.

You have already made it clear in your previous posts what the definition of Nunc Pro Tunc is and you don't need to belabor the point. You did forget that it is "Latin".

As I said before, Nunc Pro Tunc is used for reasons other than clerical, as you have pointed out. (Very good Why Chat you did your homework assignment)You can now go to the head of the class.

A clerk never wants to admit that they made a clerical error, as they are THE CLERK. So...at times the clerks need a little coaxing to correct their mistakes, i.e., (Civil action against them requiring them to pay for damages) and still would have to correct the Judgment, Nunc Pro Tunc.

In the case of this poster and as I have such a case and Judgment in front of me, and in your words to me a few weeks ago, "YOU SHOULD READ MORE AND POST LESS".




Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:


[ Follow Ups ]   [ Post Followup ]   [ Credit Forum Index ]

 

    Top Of Page

  

Copyright © 1999-2003 Enkephalos Web Design