Home
Public Forum
Credit Reports
Apply For Cards
Credit Directory
Credit Overview
Credit Problems
Credit News
International
Credit Glossary
Purchase Books
Credit Laws
Business Credit
Merchant Accts
   

Re: To: Power Johnson, no need for others to respond to this.


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Credit Forum Index ]

Posted by Parry (67.5.185.235) on January 20, 2004 at 21:41:18:

In Reply to: To: Power Johnson, no need for others to respond to this. posted by SunkissedBeach on January 20, 2004 at 20:27:14:

You are a fraud Christine.

You say CA will settle for 30% on a contingency based collection--where you still have to pay the client at least 20%---just so some jerk collector can hit goal.

But the kicker is you want an Intel check by phone-- now based upon a FAX--(which is an illegal communication because it is not a private communication)---and only promise to send a letter quote:

"By giving the Intel check shows that you are serious paying this debt. If you start talking money orders, etc..they will not take you as seriously and try to help you.

"Tell them you also want to receive a release letter "when they verify funds and the payment is good."

What a FLIM FLAM artist you are!

The other 70% will be sold to another agency!





Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:


[ Follow Ups ]   [ Post Followup ]   [ Credit Forum Index ]

 

    Top Of Page

  

Copyright © 1999-2004 Enkephalos Web Design