Home
Public Forum
Credit Reports
Apply For Cards
Credit Directory
Credit Overview
Credit Problems
Credit News
International
Credit Glossary
Purchase Books
Credit Laws
Business Credit
Merchant Accts
   

Re: why chat is it better for me not to pay a CA?


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Credit Forum Index ]

Posted by Parry (67.5.187.221) on January 28, 2004 at 13:17:44:

In Reply to: Re: why chat is it better for me not to pay a CA? posted by KS on January 28, 2004 at 12:45:18:

That is wrong. Per FCRA you cannot re-age an account by paying on it. The SOL for reporting begins with the first MISSED payment that led to the delinquency being reported. This date is a date-certain and does not change, regardless of the number of times a debt is sold or changes hand. The SOL per FCRA is 7 years. Once again, no creditor action can re-start this SOL.

I suggest you dispute the re-aging with all (3) CB and get it removed.



Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:


[ Follow Ups ]   [ Post Followup ]   [ Credit Forum Index ]

 

    Top Of Page

  

Copyright © 1999-2004 Enkephalos Web Design