Re: W&A and Arbitration
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Credit Forum Index ]
Posted by computerguy
(204.180.131.3) on February 24, 2004 at 16:33:19:
In Reply to: W&A and Arbitration posted by Reformed on February 24, 2004 at 16:07:08:
They are the scum bags of the earth and it's about time that we start prevailing on their sham corrupted awards. Read the Uniform Arbitration Act especially section 23 and section 25. These guys just follow the Act but use a biased prejudiced Arbitrator that they Manage. They always when and then they do what is prescribed in Section 25 and get the judgment. Here's something to keep in mind! 1. Section 23(a)(2) is based on UAA Section 12(a)(2). The reason “evident partiality” is a grounds for vacatur only for a neutral arbitrator is because nonneutral arbitrators, unless otherwise agreed, serve as representatives of the parties appointing them. As such, these non-neutral, party-appointed arbitrators are not expected to be impartial in the same sense as neutral arbitrators. Macneil Treatise § 28.4. However, corruption and misconduct are grounds to vacate an award by both neutral arbitrators and non-neutral arbitrators appointed by the parties. A person needs to file all copies of Validation requests and green slips at the court house and Arb rejection letter based on their collusion with the NAF. They also need to attach a copy of the collusion flyer with the Arb Rejection letter and the Validation letter sent to Wolpoff & Abramson. They need to motion to dismiss the Arb Award or Stay the Arb award. I'm not a Lawyer or legal type but I do know someone that is doing battle with them at this time based on their corrupted collusion of managing the NAF.
Follow Ups:
Post a Followup
|