|
|
Asset Acceptance, still...
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Credit Forum Index ]
Posted by J in AZ
(68.2.48.86) on February 29, 2004 at 11:32:00:
Earlier, you mentioned that I should file an amended answer.
"File an ammended answer, stating that the ALLEGED claim is time-barred, and that the claim is made VOID because the original installment sales contract did not meet the requrments of Az law."
Which requirements are you referring to?
I don't need to wait for them to provide a copy. They already did, and it does specifically state that it is a promisary note... Also, what effect does this have on my credit bureau report? Will the debt still show as unpaid, or what?
As I said, I'd like to buy a house soon, so the faster I can get this resolved, the better.
Ideally, I'd like to do something that just gets rid of this.
Would it be faster to offer them a really small settlement? 'course, the problem with this is that they may sell the debt again, as has been pointed out... Can they do this if it's already past SoL?
I have been posting as Anon, and I'm the guy who is being sued by Asset Acceptance in AZ, but I figured I'd use a specific handle to keep things clear...
J in AZ
Follow Ups:
Post a Followup
|
