Re: Why chat...Kimber case in california??

Posted by Why Chat (209.240.205.61) on April 19, 2004 at 21:43:38:

In Reply to: Why chat...Kimber case in california?? posted by Stacey on April 19, 2004 at 21:23:34:

OK- It's not straightforward-
The FTC in several opinion letters have stated that reporting to CRA's is a form of continued collection activity.

The Ca. Courts have held that ANY collection activity by a CA after SOL constitutes a violation of the FDCPA as there is an implication they have a legal right to file suit, and a "least sophisticated" debtor wold not know of their SOL protection.

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup