Re: Asset Acceptance - "Assignee"

Posted by Why Chat (209.240.205.61) on May 02, 2004 at 09:18:45:

In Reply to: Re: Asset Acceptance - "Assignee" posted by casey on May 02, 2004 at 07:52:46:

Your situation is VERY different than the poster on this thread, however, let me try to give some simple guidelines:

If you are being sued, you need to answer with a notice of appearance and any and all affirmative defenses you have.

If you do not file an answer and otice of appearance AND show up for any hearing, the CA will get a default judgment.

In MOST cases (99.999% with A$$(O)LES Unacceptable) the CA has NO legal evidence that is accepted in ANY Court of their claim. They have neither documentation of their "right" to file the suit ( with a notarized bill of sale or assignment) or copies of the original application, or accounting for the amounts owed.

The "pseudo" proof of claim they file with their initial claim is BOGUS and is only intended to fulfil a cursory inspection by a clerk for them to file the suit. IT IS NOT PROPER OR SUFFICIENT PROOF OF THEIR CLAIM.

In the case of the original poster, you have a garbage scam CA lying (illegally) about their right to collect on a judgment that they have NO rights on.

If you lok at the Court records of ANY jurisdiction, you will see a BUNCH of "assignments" legally filed, most of them are mortgages, some are leases,some are judgments, but the common element is that a FILED document must have a FILED assignment (from the original filer) to transfer their interest.

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup