Re: Eskanos & Adler sueing - Another "great collector"

Posted by jw (66.159.199.55) on June 26, 2004 at 12:42:41:

In Reply to: Re: Eskanos & Adler sueing - Another "great collector" posted by BeenThereStillDoingThat on June 26, 2004 at 11:43:53:

Hee you might want to look up these cases

Riccio v. Eskanos & Adler
US District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division

ESKANOS & ADLER, PC v.RENE ROMAN
http://www.ce9.uscourts.gov/Web/bap.nsf/0/4afc97b4ebd33e2088256c3700624e86?OpenDocument

ESKANOS & ADLER, P.C. v. LEETIEN (11/07/02 - No. 01-56203) (9th Cir Ct App) 11 U.S.C. section 362(a) of the Bankruptcy Code imposes an affirmative duty to discontinue post-petition collection actions, and sanctions are appropriate under section 362(h) where a collection agent willfully violated an automatic stay after receiving notice of a bankruptcy petition. 11 U.S.C. section 362(a) of the Bankruptcy Code imposes an affirmative duty to discontinue post-petition collection actions, and sanctions are appropriate under section 362(h) where a collection agent willfully violated an automatic stay after receiving notice of a bankruptcy petition.
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/9th/0156203p.pdf

Walsh v. Eskanos & Adler, Case No. CV-98-8198-DDP (Ex) (C.D. Cal. 1999). Rule 68 judgment entered against large, California debt-collection law firm; U.S. District Judge Dean D. Pregerson presiding.

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup