Re: CA Attorney vs CA & cease - comm Letter
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Credit Forum Index ]
Posted by computerguy
(204.180.131.3) on August 11, 2004 at 14:31:01:
In Reply to: CA Attorney vs CA & cease - comm Letter posted by Susan on August 11, 2004 at 12:16:01:
It's my opinion to have all 3rd Parties Validate and Prove their Claim. This would also include a C&D that allows them to contact you via U.S. Mails only if they show proper proof of claim which includes the Original copy of the signed Contract and signed Agreement of the alleged debt and all accounting history from the conception of the alleged debt to the date of their latest dunning letter and their authority to collect on the debt and a bunch of other stuff. By the time your done with the letter and their done reading and thinking about it, they will leave you alone. Throw this in somewhere on your Validation request letter: I must demand that the validation I hereby lawfully request be in the form of a notarized statement by a person with original knowledge of the debt as it was constituted and who can testify that the debt was incurred legally, was not subsequently disputed as a result of returned, faulty, or recalled consumer products. If you are collecting on any open credit card or book account, I am requesting that you send me a copy of my original application or sales agreement, so that I can identify my signature. I require compliance with the terms and conditions of this letter within 30 days, or a complete withdrawal, in writing, of any claim.
Follow Ups:
Post a Followup
|
