Home
Public Forum
Credit Reports
Apply For Cards
Credit Directory
Credit Overview
Credit Problems
Credit News
International
Credit Glossary
Purchase Books
Credit Laws
Business Credit
Merchant Accts
   

Re: Can CAs refuse a payment plan ; Unable to Post


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Credit Forum Index ]

Posted by Keyser Soze (149.174.164.81) on August 21, 2004 at 20:37:09:

In Reply to: Can CAs refuse a payment plan U offer? posted by dazed and confused on August 21, 2004 at 19:25:44:

To whom it may concern;

Unable to post on 'post new message'. Trolls? Posting fine when answering others'.

On another note, rather than gratify and enrich the severely and profoundly deviant gits otherwise known as trolls, two points:

1. In the Florida Killing Fields, we have Florida Statutes. These aren't Statues that you, Mr. Troll, fondle while your heart rate, blood pressure, and other anatomical appendages, reach for the moon. You know the statues I mean, made of rubber, painted with a crude human face? Some call them 'blow up dolls'. Perhaps you should stop videoing yourself as you so do. Waste of ferrous oxide tape.
Florida Statutes are silent re 'Class A, B, or C" anything. Were you in class 'A', as in 'atavistic morons'? Florida rates crimes by degree, i.e., First Degree Felony, or, Misdemeanor in the Third Degree. Oh, re internet photos of you and Mizz Blowup, love your new hairpiece. Next time, place it atop your head.

2. RE: 'Remon', almost an anagram for 'Moron. I doubt our esteemed colleague, Bud Hibbs, is losing sleep over spook stories re slander suits.
Most are familiar with two components necessary to prove libel - malice aforethought, and false accusations. This pertains to persons both public and private. The bar is higher for public figures.
Recent RI case held that corporations and their officials are equivalent to public figures. In short, say what you want about a corporation and/or its high-profile personnel. They do not enjoy the protections of a private citizen.

Third test. In addition to malice and lies, plaintiff must prove financial loss.
Hard to prove, the reason slander suits take seven or more years, plaintiffs many times losing.

In my case, 'Geraldine Galeazzo of the Vicounts', a lawyer, facilitated the fleecing of an elderly relative of twenty-million dollars. He always threatens to sue me for 'false allegations'. Why doesn't he? Because my exercise of right of Discovery will finish him, along with two 'nieces', a crooked HMO, and an Ivy League University, all of whom are culpable.
You see, these cretins, some of whom 'may be deviant', called me 'disturbed', 'deceased', 'disappeared', and other defamatory names, in effort to conceal their crimes by which rightful beneficiearies were denied that which is rightfully theirs. I can sue them. Why? They spoke both maliciously and falsely - and - I can prove I have lost, while they gained. Better still, I can write. I can write publicly and broadly, in day's light, a place they cannot go, for fear of shrivelling up, in manner of recently passed feline tapeworms.
Bud Hibbs writes with clarity about the fulminating bleb called the 'collections skindustry'. Do they claim his words to be false? Malicious? The collections industry is in its essence false, malicious and costly to consumers. Has Mr. Hibbs cost them money?
A perfect illustration of criminal projection, by which thugs accuse of gross wrongdoing, those who will surely bring them to justice.

Justly,

Keyser Soze

"Justice. That's what the man got, Justice."
- Det. Sgt. Wendell 'Bud' White, LAPD,
c. 1997, "L.A. Confidential"




Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:


[ Follow Ups ]   [ Post Followup ]   [ Credit Forum Index ]

 

    Top Of Page

  

Copyright © 1999-2004 Enkephalos Web Design